I’ve been pondering this hood for the past couple of years and even made several different patterns for it. Frustratingly, none of them ever looked quite like those depicted in illustrations.
The explanation often given for this problem is, “it’s the artist’s conception, it didn’t/couldn’t really look like that”.
I’ve never been comfortable with that reasoning.
Artwork in the 15th century was certainly stylized, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the clothing didn’t look essentially as it is depicted. I never like to assume that because I can’t get it to look right, that it just wasn’t so! Extant examples of clothing are rare; art is often the only clue we have. Dismissing it removes one of the few means we have to determine the success of a project.
It arguably gives more insight into “what was” if an object is made using period-plausible methods and patterns AND the result looks reasonably like those depicted by its contemporary artists. It’s also pretty exciting when it happens!
This brings me back to the mystery of this particular hood. Someone recently told me they thought it must be simple; just a piece of cloth tied around the head. That’s the same theory I’d been working with all this time. Her comment also made me recall a lady at Pennsic telling me the she believed medieval people would have done “whatever was easiest” to achieve a result, and this got me thinking.
Many extant objects tell a much different story. In our busy modern age we tend to be convenience-driven, much more so than our medieval counterparts. Consider as just one set of examples, the extant clothing finds from Greenland. Far from being “simple”, or made the “easiest way possible”, many show complicated cutting layouts, extensive seam finishing, and even unnecessary false seams added, presumably, for the sake of symmetry. The makers appear to be more interested in esthetics than ease or simplicity.
With this in mind I chose to approach the hood from the opposite perspective. I gave up simple.
My two new objectives were:
-I wanted a pattern that could be made with little-to-no wasted fabric.
-I wanted the finished result to look like the artwork examples.
The characteristics of the hood as shown in artwork examples are:
The crown is rounded and fits smoothly over the back of the head
The front edge is chin length or just slightly longer; it can be wider with a turn-back or not.
The “ties” are only long enough to tie on top of the head or overlap slightly, they don’t wrap back around the head.
The ties are wider in the back and gather or taper down to being narrower by the time they meet.
Lastly, the look I want most to achieve, the ties follow a gathered “swoop” from the back to the front without sticking out or being too bulky.
After two years, three completely different designs, four minor variations, many cups of tea, and at least a dozen more grey hairs, I finally hit on a design I think really works.
It fits well, is comfortable, doesn’t slip off my head, makes excellent use of fabric with zero waste, and ……….looks like the art! Yay!
It IS more complicated than just a piece of fabric tied around your head, but in the end it’s still fairly simple and works up very quickly – I can make one in just a few hours: Here is the pattern!
Final pictures and a photo diary to follow.
I have to take some better photos of this but here’s one – the crown has come untucked so it doesn’t look the best.
Update! I’ve added a few more photos which are hopefully a little better:









Eagerly awaiting photos!
By: Meredith on February 20, 2012
at 9:10 PM
[...] Late 15th Century White Hood or Coif – Transition Period / War of the Roses I don’t understand how her pattern works. I think I need to just make one out of fabric and [...]
By: 15th Century Tailed Cap (aka: Flemish Kerchief) « Research Dumping Grounds on June 7, 2012
at 2:09 PM
It IS kind of a weird pattern – I took pictures as I was making it which may help – I’ll try to get around to posting them up after the weekend.
By: sevenstarwheel on June 7, 2012
at 2:34 PM
I’m finding a LOT of the time when we don’t know something people jump to the “it’s just the artist’s convention, they didn’t really look like that or do that or have that etc”. I think also when we think of ‘easier’ we forget that the consttruction of the garment was the small work when you compare it to the construction of the cloth and thread.
I think your hood looks great!
By: cathelinadialessandri on June 24, 2012
at 6:26 AM
Please post the pics! I’ll be making this one soon. Thanks for the analysis!
By: maniacalmedievalist on November 10, 2012
at 9:09 AM
Thanks for the pattern. I’ve made a coif to this pattern and worn it on several occasions, though I had to add 1/2″ of tape at the back of the neck to compensate for my fat head. I am not happy with the bias in the front section of the coif – if I do it again I will make that section straight grain.
By: Susan Haseltine on January 7, 2013
at 8:22 PM
Awesome! I wear mine often as it’s so comfortable. I know what you mean about the bias – it’s partly why I put in a stiffener-layer (which is always straight grain). If you don’t the front edge goes wavy and I don’t like it. I use the stiffener even when I make the front section straight-grain (yes, I do both ways too). The all-bias idea came from trying to get two caps from one square with no waste at all. If your head is bigger – try starting with a square that’s a little bigger, I have a pretty tiny head. One thing I also do now is to pin, sew or tack the edge of back triangle piece down the back edge of the front piece for an inch or two. It then forms a bit more of a cap and doesn’t come untucked like it is in my photo and it makes the swoop better. I have some more photos of this I should really get around to posting. Do you have any of yours?
Cheers,
Lucrece
By: sevenstarwheel on January 9, 2013
at 12:03 AM
I spent a recent car trip trying to puzzle out how they would have cut this cap, settling on a clothes-peg style pattern (yet to be cut and tested). This seems like a promising pattern, and I may try both for the difference.
I know there’s evidence for stiffened brims (pastes) in use at court. Have you tried starching the brim?
By: Karinne on March 6, 2013
at 1:25 AM
I think a really stiffened brim (a paste) would be too stiff. I have lightly starched them before, it looks nice, but starch doesn’t last when it’s hot and humid -so mostly I don’t bother.
I use the interlining because 1) it’s straight of grain, and the brim is bias. Bias brims go wobbly without it which doesn’t look nice 2)using a stiffer linen just for the interlining of brim means I can use a softer lighter linen for the rest. A coif made all out of stiff thick linen usually isn’t as nice and doesn’t do the “swoopy” part very well.
You can make the brim straight of grain too (even then, I still like to interline, I’m picky and it just looks better). You start with a rectangle, cut two rectangles for the brims, and then a square which is further cut in half on the diagonal to make the triangles. This gets you you two caps. I posted the alternate layout above.
I’d love to see your pattern idea.
Cheers,
Lucrece
By: sevenstarwheel on March 6, 2013
at 2:30 PM
Thank you so much for this pattern! I have been trying to recreate this cap for ages, and the pattern in the ‘medieval tailor’s assistant’ just never looked right at all. I made up one of these yesterday and was so pleased with it. I wore it around all day and found it very comfy and easy to wear. I think I might try your tip of tacking down the sides of the triangle a bit to keep the crown looking neat without readjustment.
Thank you again! This pattern is a god-send for me!
YIS,
Claudine
By: Claudine delaTour on March 14, 2013
at 8:39 AM
I’m glad you liked it and that it worked for you! I would love to see a picture. I do find that tacking down about 1″ to 1 1/2″ of the sides of the triangle improves it. Sometimes I just pin it, from laziness really, sewing it would be better. Which version did you do – the original all bias or the newer one I just posted a while ago where the brim is straight grained and the triangle bias? The only thing that bothers me that I haven’t solved all that well is the back is a bit see-through if I use a very fine linen – and I have dark hair so it’s noticeable. I will have to try doubling the triangle, but then it might be a bit bulky.
Thanks for the feedback,
Best Regards,
Lucrece
By: sevenstarwheel on March 14, 2013
at 12:57 PM
I tried the original. It was a bit stretchy until I got the stiffener in place. I will admit to trying to machine sew first (I was considering it a mock-up…), but gave up as it was pulling it all out of shape. There are times when hand-sewing is really the only way! I will try to get my daughter to get a picture of it! I used a medium-thin, well-washed linen, and it seems to be not see-through and still swoopy. Maybe I will wait to send in a pic of the all-hand-sewn, currently-being-made, second half of the triangle.
By: Claudine on March 16, 2013
at 9:04 AM
I see the pattern but how does it go together?
By: SECSala on May 6, 2013
at 5:43 PM
Are you maybe looking at the alternate layout instead of the original pattern (there’s a link to it in the body of the post)?
By: sevenstarwheel on May 6, 2013
at 11:12 PM